From Trump Critic to Cautious Supporter: Ann Coulter on the Second Term and Cable News Failures

Coulter’s recent criticism of FOX News:
“Watching Fox News assure viewers the Iran war is going SUPER well and Trump is a total stud is like watching the same network assure viewers that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 election and Trump was the winner.”
— Conservative political commentator Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter’s view of Fox News is mostly disagreeable and frequently critical, especially in recent years. She sees the network as often prioritizing neocon foreign policy, corporate interests (e.g., cheap labor via immigration), pro-establishment spins, and overly rosy or misleading coverage rather than hard-hitting conservative principles—particularly on immigration enforcement and avoiding unnecessary wars. She has long accused it of softening or misrepresenting issues in ways that betray its audience.

Ann Coulter’s view on CNN reporting is strongly negative and dismissive. She regards CNN as a reliably partisan, left-leaning outlet that prioritizes ideological narratives over facts, especially on immigration, crime, and Trump-related stories. In her framing, CNN often misleads viewers, omits inconvenient details, platforms uninformed guests, and serves as part of the broader “Democratic Party subsidiaries” (alongside MSNBC, The New York Times, etc.).

Coulter is outspoken about her views on the news media and Trump. Check her column regularly and her X posts (Tweets).

Political commentators on the right, including Ann Coulter, have increasingly turned on one another, with some—most notably Dan Bongino and Candace Owens—engaging in particularly heated or erratic rhetoric.

Ann Coulter was one of Trump’s biggest boosters. She wrote the book In Trump We Trust, called him a “god” at rallies, and credited him with channeling voter rage on immigration (the subject of her earlier book Adios, America). She saw him as the only candidate who would actually deliver on border security, deportations, and ending “amnesty.”

First term (2017–2021): She became one of his harshest conservative critics. She repeatedly called him “failing,” “gutless,” a “shallow, lazy ignoramus,” and accused him of surrounding himself with nepotistic/globalist advisors (Jared & Ivanka) while breaking his core promise on the wall and mass deportations. At one point she even floated possibly voting for Biden out of frustration, saying immigration had gotten worse under Trump than it would have under a Democrat.

2022–2024: She declared “Trump is done” and called him an “awful, awful person” who “can barely speak English” and is a “gigantic baby.” She mocked his post-2020 obsession with election grievances as a distraction. In 2024 she said she would still vote for him—but only reluctantly, because she trusted JD Vance on immigration and wanted to prevent Trump from running again in 2028 if he lost.

Second term (2025–present): She has flipped back to enthusiastic. In recent interviews she describes the current administration as “a million times better” than the first term, says she is “in heaven” and “ecstatic,” and gives it high marks (e.g., 9/10) for finally delivering on the immigration issues she cares about most. She still criticizes him on specific things (e.g., “Kim Jong Il-style” cabinet tributes, Epstein files, NFTs/memecoins, or any foreign-policy distractions), but her overall tone is that Trump 2.0 is finally doing what she wanted all along.

Coulter has never been a full-throated “the election was stolen / Trump actually won” proponent. Her position is nuanced and consistent with her long-standing skepticism of media denialism: She does believe voter fraud is real and underreported. In a December 9, 2020 column (“Voter Fraud Never Happens! (Except in These 10,000 Cases)”), she listed dozens of documented cases and blasted the media for pretending fraud is impossible while acknowledging it in every other context.

She rejects the idea that fraud “rigged” or stole the election for Biden. She has criticized Trump for making “stolen election” the centerpiece of the 2022 midterms, arguing it was a losing distraction and that his own failures on immigration were the real reason he lost. She treats the extreme “Trump won in a landslide” narrative as false propaganda.

Jason Remington

(((Admin/Editor | Airchecks | CONTACT))) KTOY (WA) | KVAC (WA) | KDFL (WA) | KONP (WA) | KBAM (WA) | KJUN (WA) | KRPM (WA) | KAMT (WA) | KASY (WA) | KBRD (WA) | KTAC (WA) | KMTT (WA) | KOOL (AZ)

2 thoughts on “From Trump Critic to Cautious Supporter: Ann Coulter on the Second Term and Cable News Failures

  1. MTG piles on

    Bill • March 30, 2026

    Former Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene accused Fox News of peddling pro-war propaganda via its coverage on Sunday afternoon. ”Fox News is now the fake news. Brainwashing boomers to support what we voted against.”

    Her comment was in response to Ann Coulter, complaining about Fox’s tone during its coverage of the conflict.

    The post immediately racked up more than 500,000 views as well as a response from the White House.

    ‘There is nothing more “America Last” than quitting on your constituents and the MAGA movement in the middle of your term,’ White House spokesperson David Ingle told Fox News.

    ‘President Trump is fighting every single day to Make America Great Again – we don’t have time for quitters.’

    (Point and counterpoint)

    Reply

    1. MTG's position

      Jason Remington • March 30, 2026

      MTG falls somewhere within these three factions:

      America First / non-interventionist isolationism: Proponents argue the U.S. should stop prioritizing foreign entanglements and endless aid, focusing instead on domestic problems like borders, economy, and infrastructure. They claim unconditional support for Israel drags America into Middle East wars that don’t serve U.S. interests, costs billions in taxpayer money with little direct benefit, and fuels anti-American blowback/terrorism. Figures like Tucker Carlson and some younger MAGA/Republican voices have amplified this, questioning why the U.S. backs Israel’s objectives (e.g., in Gaza or Iran) when it leads to higher U.S. costs or risks. This view sees the alliance as outdated post-Cold War and not truly reciprocal.

      Fiscal conservatism and aid skepticism: Critics highlight that the U.S. has provided Israel with over $300 billion in aid (mostly military) since 1948, and question whether it’s sustainable or wise when U.S. domestic needs (e.g., infrastructure, veterans) go unmet. Recent polls show 60%+ of voters (including many Republicans under 50) now oppose more military aid, viewing it as a blank check.

      Strategic/realist critique: Some argue Israel has become a net liability—it complicates U.S. relations with Arab/Muslim nations, hinders diplomacy (e.g., with Iran), and ties America to policies that undermine its global image or values. This isn’t new but has intensified with Gaza conflicts.

      Critics and observers increasingly describe Marjorie Taylor Greene as politically sidelined or irrelevant following her resignation from Congress.

      Reply

Reply to Bill Cancel reply

Comments may be held for review by the Admin before being posted.